October 10, 2016
by Jeffrey
0 comments
This case concerns whether activities in a Reg 3(1)(b) were fundamentally the same before and after the transfer as required by Reg 3(2A). The Facts The Claimants were employed by a charity, CCL. They formed a team working in adult … Continue reading
June 13, 2016
by Jeffrey
0 comments
This case is another useful example of the difficulties in determining whether there is an organised grouping of employees whose principal purposes is the carrying out of the relevant activities on behalf of the relevant client (as required by Reg … Continue reading
March 11, 2016
by Jeffrey
0 comments
Although there are a number of factually specific issues in this appeal there is one clear issue of law which is not insignificant and it is this: In a Reg 3(1)(b) Service Provision Change (SPC) is it necessary for the … Continue reading