June 13, 2017
by Jeffrey
0 comments
Postscript My last post concerned this case when an interim injunction was refused. I noted the case raised interesting arguments in relation to the interaction between TUPE and restrictive covenants and, in particular, the right to object under Reg … Continue reading
June 13, 2016
by Jeffrey
0 comments
This case is another useful example of the difficulties in determining whether there is an organised grouping of employees whose principal purposes is the carrying out of the relevant activities on behalf of the relevant client (as required by Reg … Continue reading
November 27, 2015
by Jeffrey
0 comments
By Reg 3(3), a pre-condition of a Service Provision Change under Reg 3(1)(b) is that the client ‘intends that the activities will, following the service provision change, be carried out by the transferee other than in connection with a single specific … Continue reading